Hi Patti -- my point, in making that sample list, was to illustrate how some self-proclaimed intersectional feminists engage in oppression-ranking, even if they don't intend to. By "oppression-ranking," I'm also referring to the dynamic where they only see/consider an attribute of privilege that someone else possesses...or, in some cases, how certain attributes can straddle the line between privilege and oppression. Hence, their embrace of "selective intersectionality."

So, for example, some "woke" archetypes might place Black people and women at the top of such a hierarchy (with Black women at the very top), while placing Latino(a) people and teenagers in lower rungs. When I speak of the "hierarchy" in this manner, I'm referring to the implicit default setting by which someone's identity per se is supposed to entitle them to deference in daily discourse, according to these leftists or "progressives."

Obviously, that sort of philosophy can end up backfiring on them, because (as Johnny alluded to, elsewhere in this Comments Section) specific issues and contexts will be more relevant to members of some groups over others, based on the scenario.