I can't get onboard with the notion that the concept of "chivalry" (as blandly as it can be defined, these days) should be taught to students in "gendered" iterations based on traditionalism.

I write about this more in the following op-ed piece of mine:

https://medium.com/counterarts/the-chivalry-fallacy-8284446fffb8

But the gist of it is: "chivalry" should be redefined as multidirectional and gender-inclusive.